Send the reference you already have. The garment comes back on-model, on a consistent set, so a whole category page reads as one shoot rather than twelve.















Left is the reference the brand sent. Right is what came back. Drag across any of the eight.
Their referenceOur output
↔
Drag the handle. Left is what the brand sent us. Right is what came back, shot on a consistent set so the whole range reads as one shoot.
Pick a garmentSeven steps, run every drop.
Flat lays, packshots, fit notes. No studio slot, no sample shipping, no call sheet.
Model direction, styling, background and light, decided once for the whole drop.
One look comes back before the range starts, so the set is signed off on a real garment.
Every SKU on the same set-up, so the category page reads as one shoot.
Drape, length and print placement reviewed per garment. Anything dishonest gets flagged back.
Feed, story and banner composed per placement rather than cropped from a master.
New colourways, markets and size representation slot into the same look later.
Not the photography. The decisions around it.
A drop photographed across three sessions reads as three brands. Light shifts, the model changes, the background moves half a stop, and the category page becomes a patchwork that no amount of grid layout can rescue.
The set-up is agreed once and held across the whole drop. Same light, same distance, same crop logic, whether that is eight garments or eighty.
A sample pinned at the back photographs beautifully and sells a return. Shoppers notice the gap between the image and the parcel, and the return rate is where it shows up, not the engagement rate.
Drape, length and fit are represented as the garment actually behaves. Anything that cannot be shown honestly gets flagged back to you rather than quietly fixed in post.
Budget goes to six hero looks and the remaining forty SKUs get a flat lay. Those forty are usually where the volume sits, and they are the ones a shopper actually scrolls past.
The range is costed as a range. Hero treatment and long-tail coverage come off the same set-up, so the fiftieth SKU looks like the first.
Set the volume. The turnaround follows.
Everything brands ask before the first batch.
That is the point. The set-up is agreed once and held, so twelve garments read as one shoot rather than twelve sessions.
Model swaps run against the same look, so a size range or a market variant does not restart the shoot.
There is no minimum, but the saving compounds with range. One garment proves the look; fifty is where the scheduling maths changes.
Yes. Full usage on everything produced, with no per-placement licensing.
Send the frames you want matched and the set is built to sit beside them rather than replace them.
The first garment is the sign-off point. Once the look is agreed, the range runs against it, so revisions are rare and cheap.
Yes, and it is often the right call for SKUs where a model adds nothing.
Most brands arrive for one and end up using three.
Packshot, lifestyle, detail and campaign imagery without booking a shoot.
↗02Static, motion, video and creator cutdowns, briefed on what your category already rewards.
↗03High-SKU creative systems for feeds, launches and paid catalog campaigns.
↗04PDP imagery, A+ modules, storefronts and marketplace-ready variants.
↗Share a packshot and the range you need covered.